The Second Most Dangerous Man in America

The policies of Eric Holder make him the second most dangerous man in America. Holder has a long history of coddling terrorists and his recent comments regarding his desire to circumvent the Constitution by revoking the Miranda rights of US Citizens is quite disturbing.

When the Obama administration took over from President Bush, one of the first policies they implemented was to have our soldiers as well as CIA and FBI agents begin to read enemy combatants Miranda rights. "I witnessed it myself" said Representative Mike Rogers (R, Michigan) in an article by Fox News.

Holder has a long history of defending our enemies rather than defending Americans. When holder worked for the Clinton administration, he was instrumental in pardoning 16 FALN terrorists (Fuerzas Armadas de Liberacion Nacional). The FALN waged a bloody bombing campaign in the 70's and 80's that injured dozens and killed several people. Holder did this despite the protests of the FBI, federal prosecutors, and victims.

After entering private practice, Holder's law firm Covington & Burling secured the release of several Gitmo detainees by offering more than 3,000 hours of pro bono legal service. At least one of the detainees rejoined the war in Iraq and launched an attack as a suicide bomber killing 13 soldiers and wounding 42 more.

Holder can't or won't even admit that radical Islam exists (see video here). Why is that? Why is it that Holder and this administration want to give aid and comfort to our enemies?

When faced with this same situation in World War II, FDR swiftly executed 6 German saboteurs by utilizing military tribunals. Yet Holder and President Obama want to give the detainees at Gitmo civilian trials and treat war and terrorism as a law enforcement matter.

The trials will take years and cost the taxpayers millions of dollars. It will also will certainly lead to security threats and open America up to further terrorist attacks. What better way for an islamo-facist member of Al Qaeda to meet his maker than to bomb a US courthouse during one of these trials?

Despite the fact that we continue to afford our enemies the rights of an American citizen now Holder wants Congress to modify the rules. In the wake of the failed Christmas bombing by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, holder and the Obama administration now want to change the Miranda laws. Umar is a naturalized citizen originally from Pakistan but could have been classified as an enemy combatant under the same precedent that FDR used in WWII.

What's troubling about holders shift is that it appears that he wants this power for handling American citizens. If they are able to make this change, what would stop them from listing the Tea Party as a terrorist organization and then hold people indefinitely?

Couple this with comments made by Supreme Court Nominee Elana Kagan; "Whether a given category of speech enjoys first amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the speech against it's societal costs."

So if the administration doesn't like what we have to say, then by Kagan's assertion, the government could ban that speech. If we persist with our speech, then they could arrest us and hold us indefinitely if Holder gets his way and is able to amend the current Miranda laws.

What next, will anyone that disagrees with the administration be sent for re-education?

See you in the trenches,

www.toddkinsey.com

Obama says information is a distraction?

Last weekend, President Obama gave the commencement speech at Hampton University in Virginia. In that speech is the now infamous ipod quote, "You are coming of age in a 24-7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to to all kinds of arguments, some of which don't rank that high on the truth meter. And with iPods and iPads, X-boxes and Play Stations; none of which I know how to work. Information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than a means of emancipation." (video here)

The media tried to laugh this off as the president being funny and technology challenged. Since when is information a distraction? Information is POWER! And that is why the president and his minions in the liberal media have been in an all out assault on Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Sean, Hannity, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin, and the Tea Party.

The president and the left understand the threat that Fox News, talk radio, and the Internet present to their hostile takeover of America.

The president has now created his own White House media that has been the only outlet to interview supreme court nominee, Elana Kagan. Why hasn't anyone else been able to interview her? So they can control the information and therefore the power. Where does that rate on the truth meter Mr. President?

We're beginning to see some dissension in the ranks. There have been a few in the liberal media who are beginning to question the new white house media. Why, because they aren't getting an opportunity to interview Kagan? More likely it's that they're being excluded from the inner circle and losing their power. But would they really ask the tough questions? Of course not; because they are nothing more than a propaganda tool for Obama... When he needs them.

What's even more troubling is that they are excluding the media even further as evidenced by the new White House Video Blog. Here you will find all kinds of video that the media has been excluded from. I thought this was going to be the most transparent administration in history?

More like opaque. The president and his administration have become quite adept at saying one thing while doing something else entirely. What will be interesting to watch is whether or not the media will start doing there job. I doubt it.

See you in the trenches,

Todd A. Kinsey
Leading the conservative revolution...

Save NASA Rally

Republican and Tea Party groups From Houston and Galveston will be holding a rally to save jobs at NASA. The rally will begin at 6:30 PM at the League City Sportsplex.

The rally is being held to protest a Democratic fundraising rally help under the auspices of saving jobs at NASA. The rally is sponsored by the AFL-CIO Union and Speakers will include Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, Congressman Gene Green, and will be hosted by Jim Yarbrough.

Republicans and Tea Party members are upset that the democrats taking advantage of an issue of vital importance to the Houston - Galveston Bay Area. The feeling is that it is the Obama administration that has made sweeping cuts to the space program and are now trying to pin this on the past administration.

Apollo 17 commander, Eugene Cernan, the last man to walk on the moon, told lawmakers Wednesday the Obama administration's plan to shift near term space flight to private industry could result in a 10 year gap between the end of the shuttle program and the debut of reliable rockets.

NASA faced similar circumstances when Bill Clinton slashed the budget which forced mass layoffs during the 90's. Since NASA isn't a social program, Democrats seem to have little use for this program with the exception of pushing the global warming myth.

Leaders from the GOP and the Tea Party urged people to be respectful and to be aware that many media outlets are likely to be in attendance.